Thursday, 6 April 2017

Paper No 13 New Literature

  “Plot is not the main point; characters and life are Barnes’ Focus”

Name: Jayati Thakar
Paper no: 13- The New Literature
Roll. No. 30
Assignment Topic: “Plot is not the main point; characters and life are Barnes’ Focus”
Submitted to: S. B. Gardi Department of English, M. K. Bhavnagar University.






To Evaluate This Assignment Please, Click Here.




Introduction to Author:






Julian Patrick Barnes born on 19th of January; is an English writer. Barnes won the Man Booker Prize for his book ‘The Sense of an Ending’      in 2011, very recently. And three of his books had been shortlisted for the Booker Prize: Flaubert’s Parrot (1984), England, England (1998), and Arthur & George (2005). He has also written Crime Fiction under the pseudonym Dan Kavanagh. In addition to novel, Barnes has published collections of essays and short stories.  His honours also include the Somerset Maugham Award and the Geoffrey Faber Memorial Prize.  (htt17)

Introduction to the Text, “Sense of an Ending”
The novel is divided into two parts, entitled as “One” and “Two”, both of which are narrated by (60 years old) Tony Webster when he is retired and living alone. The whole narrative is a quest in past, which is roughly recalled by Tony. It is also known for its tragic investigation in past. It is withal genre under “Psychoanalytic Thriller”. 
The first part begins in the 1960s with four intellectually arrogant school friends, of whom two feature in the remainder of the story: Tony, the narrator, and Adrian, the most precociously intelligent of the four. This part mostly deals with their schooling days. Towards the end of their school days another boy named Robson committed suicide while hanging himself, apparently after getting his girlfriend pregnant. The four friends discuss the philosophical difficulty of knowing exactly what happened. (htt18) The four friends depart then and forget this incident and join different universities. Adrian goes to Cambridge and Tony to Bristol University. There tony start dating a girl called Veronica Ford. After they broke up, one day Tony got a letter from Adrian that he has been dating Veronica since they broke up. Then one sudden day after his return arrival from six month at U.S.A., Tony received one urgent letter from Alex declaring that Adrian had committed suicide. These remains the most prominent incident of part one. Then the part two is twice longer than the one come back to the present where Tony entails the letter sent by Sarah Ford (Veronica’s Mother) and she bequeathed 500 ponds to Tony and two documents. These lead him to re- establish his contact with Veronica and after a number of meeting he re-evaluates the story he narrated in the past.
“Plot is not the main point; characters and life are Barnes’ Focus.”
Before I jump to my subject I would rather like to put forth the idea of ‘Plot’ in traditional contexts given by Aristotle in his ‘Poetics’.
            
  According to Aristotle, “Plot is the soul of the Tragedy.”


Aristotle goes on to discuss the structure of the ideal tragic plot and spends several chapters on its requirements. He says that the plot must be a complete whole – with a definite beginning, middle, and end- and its length should be such that the spectators can comprehend without difficulty both its separated its parts and its overall unity. Moreover, the plot requires a single central theme in the protagonist’s fortunes, with emphasis on the dramatic causation and probably of the events. (htt15)
While come down to the modern era, the technique of telling/narrating the story has took other folds. In modern and post-modern era we find most admired style of narration is “Flesh- back” technique, which challenges the traditional pattern of narration. Where the order (Beginning, Medieval, and End) has been dismissed here. It starts from somever middle and sometimes it begun from the end and ends at the medieval or begginning.  More many ways modern pentameters have challenged the old one.
Up till now we came across the simple narrative techniques. And the Narrator always remains mouth piece of an author. A narrator builds faithful relation between author and readers. But here Julian Barnes introduces us to a totally different style of narration; where for readers it is difficult to rely on the narrator. In this text Barnes introduces his readers to the completely new technique of narration; which called “Unreliable Narration”/ “Unreliable Narrator”.  Where the narration takes place in history of Tony Webster. Who starts recalling his school days and then university days with addressing that,
“I remember it, in no particular order...” Thus it from the first creates constant dilemma among readers about his reliability. (htt19)

...turn briefly to a few incidents that have grown into anecdotes, to some approximate memories which time has deformed into certainty. If i can’t be sure of the actual events any more, I can at least be true to the impressions those facts left. That’s the best I can manage.

It has the most vary point is that there is no chronological order in events. On this ground many critics have claims that the novel is plotless or has loosely/poorly constructed plot; then it would be  injustice to Barnes. Because it has beginning, middle and the end. Barnes able to pull readers towards climax and the effect of peripateia and anagnorisis leads to the catastrophe. (htt20)
In general definition of these three words: ‘Peripateteia’, ‘Anagnorisis’, and ‘Catastrophe’.
According to Merriam Webster Dictionary:
‘Anagnorisis’ = the point in the plot especially of a tragedy at which the protagonist recognises his or her or some other character’s true identity or discovers the true nature of his or her own situation = ‘Rising action’.
‘Peripateia’ = a sudden or unexpected reversal of circumstances or situation especially in a literary work = Climax.
‘Catastrophe’ = a terrible disaster = ‘Falling action’. 
Where we find these in the text?
We can define them as:
The suicide of Adrian can be taken as ‘the Rising action or Anagnorisis’. From where the real quest began. Then the letter from Mrs. Sarah Ford and 500 pounds to Tony leads to climax. The ‘Climax or Peripatiea’;  here we can say is the 40 years old mentally retarded Man exactly looks like Adrian, when he appears in the text. The last and finally ‘the Falling action or Catastrophe’ can be consider when Tony comes to know about the fact of 40 years mentally retarded Adrian (junior); to whom he thought as the son of Veronica and Adrian is not such, because Veronica is his sister. This can really be the disastrous to Tony, where he find him guilty too. Actually this son was born mentally ill because of the mother’s convincing fetus above forty (creates disorder in new born child). His mother was non other than Sarah Ford, who initiated the physical relation with her daughter’s boyfriend. And Tony thinks it happened  because of him; while he had suggested Adrian to meet Sarah Ford before get into the relationship with Veronica and he fell into love with her. The mystery of Adrian's suicide is also now divulged that his suicide was a philosophical death; where could not bear that a woman at the age of his mum conceiving his child in her womb, and he commites suicide. Tony found himself guilty and considers his letter to Adrian as a curse.
And yet, the telling of life, the history, the memory seen through a particular character is very important in this novel. (htt20)
Meanwhile, we find that in between Barnes' tries to bring some minute narration of trivial incident like, Robson’s suicide, most  common incidents like, Old Joe Hunt, history lectures, shiner wrist watch, Camus’ philosophy of suicide, Eros and Thanatos, etc. But these all at the wider point connect down to the Adrian’s personality as a scholarly guy and his reason to commit suicide. All these incidents make whole picture of the text as a ‘psychological thriller fiction.’
Camus’ Philosophy of Suicide:
Suicide was the only true philosophical question.
..He had explain his reasoning: that life is a gift bestowed without anyone asking for it; that the thinking person has a philosophical duty to examine both the nature of lofe and the conditions it comes with; and that if this person decides to renounce this gift no one ask for, it is a moral and human duty to act on the consequences of their decision.
And this connects with Adrian’s decision to suicide when he left a note addressed to the coroner saying that the free person has a philosophical duty to examine the nature of their life and may then choose to renounce it.
And at the last we find that all those trivia were seems to postpone the truth desperately by the narrator. At the end we also finds that Tony’s narration fails at major extents.
History isn’t the lies of the victors... It’s more the memories of the survivors, most of whom are neither victorious nor defeated.”
Unreliability of the memory plays a vital role in this novel. Moreover Tony refers to old history classes time and again; at a time it seems for no use; which later connects to Tony and his till then narration. Withal he says,
History is that certainty produced at the point ehre the imperfection of memory meet the inadequacies of documentation.”
“What you End up remembering isn’t always the same as you have witnessed.”- Tony Webster (htt21)
Through out the text, whatever Tony narrates, at last it can be easily falsified because of his irresponsible attitude, he as man of free will bothers for nothing withal he has inadequate documents; which creates no sense at all and also hangs the reality in between. And whatever he narrates from his memory was half truth, we can say. Because, he can not get the simple thing. As Veronica used to say,
“You still don’t get it. You never did, and you never will. So stop even trying.”
This can also be taken as Tony’s “take the things easy” kind of attitude keeps the readers to become more curious for that thing particularly. Simultaneously, the plot seem to suffer because of the narrator’s meditating memory and nostalgic hindsight on past life.
At last i would like to conclude my topic to connect it with Samuel Beckett's quote in below image,

      In that case it is the shape what matters to Julian Barnes. The shape of narration is left the most effective impact on reader’s mind. No doubt it requires a twice or thrice reading, but it every time develops the sense of the reader.
    Thank You...


To Evaluate This Assignment Please, Click Here.

Works Cited

<https://www.cliffsnotes.com/literature/a/agamemnon-the-choephori-and-the-eumenides/critical-essay/aristotle-on-tragedy >.
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julian_Barnes >.
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Sense_of_an_Ending >.
<http://jaytithakar.blogspot.in/2017/03/the-sense-of-ending.html >.
<http://dilipbarad.blogspot.in/2014/02/the-sense-of-ending-julian-barnes.html >.
<https://www.slideshare.net/JaytiThakar94/the-sense-of-an-ending-by-julian-barnes>.
























No comments:

Post a Comment